"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
These marvelous words should be read by all who are not outraged by current events.
The first ten amendments, or the Bill of Rights, are the handiwork of James Madison. There is much misinformation about the original intent of the framers of the US Constitution, which can be clarified by reading the original articles and letters written by the founding fathers. On the topic of separation of church and state, Madison clearly believed that government should stay out of religion, period.
In Annals of Congress (Annals of Congress, Sat Aug 15th, 1789 pages 730 - 731), he summarized his position as follows:
Congress should not establish a religion and enforce the legal observation of it by law, nor compel men to worship God in any manner contrary to their conscience, or that one sect might obtain a pre-eminence, or two combined together, and establish a religion to which they would compel others to conform.
In a letter to Robert Walsh on March 2, 1819, he expresses his view that a wall between government and religion leads to increased morality:
The civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability, and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people, have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the State.
In a letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822, he writes,
Every new and successful example, therefore, of a perfect separation between the ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance; and I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion and Government will both exist in greater purity the less they are mixed together.
In a letter to Baptist Churches in North Carolina, June 3, 1811, he responded to the use of public ground for religious purposes,
To the Baptist Churches on Neal's Greek on Black Creek, North Carolina I have received, fellow-citizens, your address, approving my objection to the Bill containing a grant of public land to the Baptist Church at Salem Meeting House, Mississippi Territory. Having always regarded the practical distinction between Religion and Civil Government as essential to the purity of both, and as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, I could not have otherwise discharged my duty on the occasion which presented itself.
In vetoing this bill from the House of Representatives, he stated:
Having examined and considered the bill entitled "An act for the relief of Richard Tervin, William Coleman, Edwin Lewis, Samuel Mims, Joseph Wilson, and the Baptist Church at Salem Meeting House, in the Mississippi Territory, " I now return the same to the House of Representatives, in which it originated, with the following objection:
Because the bill in reserving a certain parcel of land of the United States for the use of said Baptist Church comprises a principle and precedent for the appropriation of funds of the United States for the use and support of religious societies, contrary to the article of the Constitution which declares that "Congress shall make no law respecting a religious establishment."
Our founding fathers were truly deep thinkers who understood the perils of mixing religion with government. The establishment clause along with the right to free speech and peaceful protest are the foundations of a civil, prosperous and moral society. We all need to relearn what was obvious to the framers of the US Constitution.
For additional information, see http://candst.tripod.com/tnppage/qmadison.htm, http://candst.tripod.com/ref3.htm and http://www.au.org/ for additional information.
