Dear Mr. Trump,
How can you call Hillary Clinton a liar when according to Politifact you lie over 70% of the time and she lies less than 30% of the time? Don’t blame this inconvenient fact on the “liberal” media. The world is not divided into only liberals and conservatives who buy the party line. Unlike you, the geeks at fact-checking organizations are interested in the truth.
How can we not believe your female accusers when their charges portray the same man that you brag about being? The respectable people that your victims confided in witnessed the anguish you caused, bolstering the likely veracity of their claims. The fact that some other men behave deplorably does not absolve you.
Why do you call yourself a successful businessperson when you lost almost a billion dollars in a boom economy by making several unwise investments? Through self-promotion, you gained celebrity status and used it lure investors into bad deals where you won and everyone else lost. You routinely default on your financial obligations to small businesses and litigate against people that have offended you. Ethical business people make deals that benefit all parties. Will you be able as president to suppress your ego and represent the best interest of the United States?
How can you be trusted to make complex decisions when you do not solicit input from experts? Solutions to modern-day problems require an informed leader who carefully weighs input from knowledgeable sources. You treat your opinions as fact even when they contradict the evidence. You state that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese government. Nonsense. Even a well-seasoned PhD physicist such as myself is unqualified to judge science outside my field without input from the experts. My conclusion that anthropomorphic climate change is happening draws on my knowledge of science and the consilience of evidence in the climate science literature. Do you plan to continue to spew uninformed opinions that go against the evidence? Doing so as the most powerful world leader could jeopardize the existence of humanity.
How could you not have known that Russia had invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea? When informed that Russia had already done so, you stated that it was your understanding that the people of Crimea rather be with Russia. How would you react if Mexico annexed southern California because people there would rather be with Mexico? Those with aspirations of being a world leader should be keenly aware of current events.
Why do you bash the media? The founding fathers so highly valued the need for a free and independent press that they elevated this principle to prominence by including it in the first amendment. The media is an essential part of our democracy. It informs our citizens and keeps politicians honest. The media, which you so despise, has given you $3 billion dollars of free coverage, so do not complain when the facts investigators uncover are inconvenient. Punishing the media would be an affront to the core principles of our democracy.
How can the elections be rigged? A recent study showed only 30 cases of voter fraud out of a billion ballots cast. You claimed, “People that have died 10 years ago are still voting,” and cited a report that found 1.8 million deceased people remain on voter registration rolls. The fact that it takes time to remove people from the voting rolls does not mean that others are voting in their places. In fact, studies show that such cases are extremely rare. You also claim that “illegal immigrants are voting,” citing research from Old Dominion University. The Harvard professor who manages the database says that this study misuses the data and that in fact very few undocumented residents are voting. If such election fraud really existed, don’t you think that the offended party would be investigating?
How can we discount your behavior as indicative of an individual who is adept at self-promotion but shows contempt for the facts, takes pleasure in unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, refuses to accept criticism, acts impulsively, and lacks the nuanced thinking needed to make rational decisions? Even if your ideology coincided with mine, a Trump presidency would terrify me. Can you convince us that you have the temperament and wisdom to lead this country? Your actions provide the strongest evidence that you do not. Though you repeat how great things will be if elected, you have not outlined a plan to get us there, nor do you appear to have any new inspirational ideas. Instead, you offer scapegoats and platitudes.
In my opinion, there is no evidence that you are fit to lead our nation. Your inability to reason logically and your refusal to heed exert advice that contradicts your gut will be disastrous for our democracy and civilization. However, if the people elect you, I will go along with the results and work towards proving me wrong in these assertions.
Mark G. Kuzyk